Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Windows 10 upgrade will be free for one year

Windows 10 upgrade will be free for one year

  • Windows 10


Windows 10 will be a free upgrade for one year if you have a Windows 7, Windows 8.1 or Windows Phone 8.1 device.

The news came at Microsoft's Windows 10 briefing, which went down earlier in Redmond, Wash.

More details on getting the upgrade are available on windows.com, but Microsoft didn't offer a release timeline for when users can expect the Windows 10 upgrade to land.

What's most intriguing is that Windows Phone 8.1 devices will jump straight to Windows 10. And as Gareth Beavis notes, Windows Phone as we know it is dead while one OS to rule them all has emerged.





Microsoft wants to spill the beans on Windows 10 for phones.

Microsoft wants to spill the beans on Windows 10 for phones

More Windows 10 for phones details to come in the next weeks

Microsoft wants to spill the beans on Windows 10 for phones
If you were watching Microsoft's recent Windows 10 event and were disappointed at the relative lack of information about the upcoming Windows 10 for phones, then fear not as Microsoft is apparently planning to unveil more features in the next few weeks.
Windows 10 is a huge deal for Microsoft, which wants to banish the memories of the poorly received Windows 8 while unifying Windows PCs, tablets and smartphones in a way that it has so far failed to do.
This means that Windows 10 is not just a desktop operating system, but it will also be the successor to Microsoft's mobile operating system Windows Phone 8.1. Microsoft's attempt to get into the smartphone market hasn't been entirely successful, so the pressure on Windows 10 for phones is high.

Upcoming features

Joe Belfiore, Vice President, Windows Phone Program Management & Design at Microsoft, has acknowledged that there is a lot of interest in Windows 10 for phone and tweeted: "Folks asking-- we are working on a video showing #win10 phone features, but it's another 1-2 weeks out."
Windows 10 for phones
Hopefully this means we won't have long to wait to get a better idea of what features Windows 10 for phone will bring to upcoming smartphones.

Facebook reports strong profits, adding millions of users.

Facebook reports strong profits, adding millions of users.

Facebook logo and people silhouetted with their phones
Facebook reported fourth-quarter profits of $701m (£462m), a 34% increase on the same period a year ago.

Advertising revenue grew by 53% to $3.59bn, with nearly 70% of that coming from mobile ad sales.
The social networking giant said it now has 1.39 billion active users each month, a 13% increase from a year ago.

"We got a lot done in 2014," said Mark Zuckerberg in a statement accompanying earnings.
Total profits for the year were $2.9bn, almost double the total for 2013.

However, the amount of profit the company made on each dollar of revenue decreased from 44% to 29% from a year earlier, as the social network invested more heavily in marketing and research and development (R&D).

The amount Facebook is spending on R&D nearly tripled to $1.1bn this quarter, as the company spent considerable sums on developing its various acquisitions such as Instagram, WhatsApp and virtual-reality headset maker Oculus Rift, as well as its own in-house messaging products and video services.

Facebook also echoed a common complaint amongst US firms this earnings season, saying its revenue would have increased by 53% instead of 49% were it not for unfavourable foreign exchange rates.
line break
  
When Facebook first floated on the stock market, founder Mark Zuckerberg said his firm needed to figure out how to make money from mobile users - and quick.

Well, job done. Facebook's mobile ads lack subtlety, for sure, but the tactic is working, and it hasn't put users off. Mobile advertising threatened to be Facebook's Achilles' heel, but now it can be regarded as its strongest asset.

When Wall Street looks at social network earnings reports, a massive emphasis is put on growth. If not enough new people are signing up, the share price suffers - just ask Twitter.

With big acquisitions - Whatsapp and Instagram - and its "next billion" targets for the developing world, Facebook is continuing to grow at a rate that satisfies shareholders.

So what's next? Last week I visited Facebook's new London HQ. It was lunchtime, and I saw several employees spending their break immersed in Oculus Rift, the virtual reality headset bought by Facebook last year. It is expected to launch this year. Mark Zuckerberg has already changed the way the world interacts once. Can he do it again?

Coder creates smallest chess game for computers & broke 33 years record.

Coder creates smallest chess game for computers & broke 33 years record.



BootChess  
BootChess' developer says he hopes to inspire the creation of other small programs
 
 
A French coder has developed what is thought to be the smallest-sized chess computer program.

BootChess is only 487 bytes in size, and the source code can be run on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux computers.

That makes it smaller than 1K ZX Chess - a Sinclair ZX81 computer game, which contained 672 bytes of code and had held the record for 33 years.

The new title's creator told the BBC that the challenge had seemed impossible at first.

Olivier Poudade added that he hoped his achievement would now inspire other programmers to get involved in the "sizecoding" scene.

"[It] demonstrates why assembly language is still the language of choice to excel [at] in programming," he said.

1K ZX Chess  
 
1K ZX Chess was put on sale in 1982 before appearing in a programming magazine the following year
"[And it] reminds others that optimising in computer programming is not only about speed, but also about size."

He said that he had also wanted to pay tribute to the craft of David Horne - 1K ZX Chess' creator - as well as other unsung heroes of the 1980's English and Russian ZX81 and ZX Spectrum coding community.
The ZX81 only had 1K - or 1,024 bytes - of RAM memory, limiting what it could do.

Today's computers typically ship with chips that can store millions of times that amount.

For comparison's sake, even a couple of image-less tweets take up roughly the same amount of data as Mr Poudade's complete program.

Pawn promotion
 
To achieve his goal, Mr Poudade - a member of the Red Sector Inc coding group - had to make the look of his game even more basic than its 1982 predecessor.

Tiny Chess  
Tiny Chess is more than twice the size of BootChess but has better graphics
The board and pieces of BootChess are represented by text alone, with P representing pawns, Q used for the queens and full stops put in the place of empty squares.

Some critics have carped that it cannot be called a "complete" chess program because it does not allow castling - a defensive move in which a king and castle/rook shift positions simultaneously.
However, Mr Poudade noted that 1K ZX Chess shared the same limitation, and highlighted that his program allowed pawns to be turned into queens when they reached the opponent's side of the board, something that was not possible in Mr Horne's game.

Even so, for those seeking a code-anaemic version of the centuries-old game that uses graphics rather than letters to represent the board and supports castling, then the 1,251 bytes-sized Tiny Chess, written in Javascript by Mexican developer Oscar Toledo G, may be the preferred option.

5 Big Concerns We Still Have About The Fantastic Four Trailer

5 Big Concerns We Still Have About The Fantastic Four Trailer

Watch Trailer And comment your review


It finally happened today. After months of staying silent and not showing any official footage, 20th Century Fox released The Fantastic Four trailer today. Set for release on August 7, this reboot will follow Reed Richards, Sue Storm, Ben Grimm and Johnny Storm as they gain extraordinary powers while traveling to another dimension. For a teaser trailer, it did a unique job of showing just enough to entice the viewer while not giving away too much action or plot-wise. At the very least, comic book fans now have a better idea of what to expect when they sit down to watch it.


While the trailer itself was not at all horrible (although it did feel generic), there were several things that felt off about it. For a film based off a group of superheroes that popularized Marvel, this didn’t feel anything like the stories about Marvel’s First Family, and there were several missed opportunities in this trailer to showcase material that would have excited fans even more. Granted, teasers hold back a lot of material so they can entice moviegoers, but even taking that into account, here are the main concerns we have towards The Fantastic Four trailer and what it could mean for the film itself.

5. We Have To Sit Through Their Origin Story Again?!?!
We Have To Sit Through Their Origin Story Again?!?!
Obviously with lesser-known heroes, it might be necessary to show moviegoers how these heroes got their start/powers, but when characters are being shown that have already been on-screen before (twice), there’s no need to spend as much time (if any) on the origin. The Fantastic Four may not be at the same level of popularity as Batman or Spider-Man, but their origin story doesn’t need to be retread again, or at least be the main focus. The main difference this time is that the four heroes will be traveling to an alternate dimension (the Negative Zone) instead of outer space, which is based off their Ultimate origin, so hopefully a new landscape will be enough to distinguish itself from the 2005 Fantastic Four movie. Either way, those four are coming back with weird conditions, and people are going to be freaked out.

 4. It Feels More Sci-Fi Than Superhero
This Feels More Like Sci-Fi Than Superhero
With all the adventures they have in outer space, alternate dimensions, other time periods and such, the Fantastic Four is rooted in sci-fi, so it’s great if these elements can be infused into the movie. It’s another thing if these same elements completely take over the story, and as a result what makes these characters iconic is put on the back-burner., i.e. being superheroes and fighting strange threats. Aside from the guys turning to rock and flame, this trailer felt closer to something like Prometheus or Interstellar than it did The Avengers or X-Men. It is possible to achieve a balance between the superhero side of things and another genre. Captain America: The Winter Soldier was a political thriller and X-Men: Days of Future Past was a time-travel epic, but both still felt like superhero adventures throughout. The Fantastic Four feels solely like a sci-fi story, which isn’t a bad thing, but because it’s based off superheroes, it comes off looking weird. Maybe the superhero elements will be more noticeable once the team has to use their new powers to take on Doom.

3. There’s No Lightheartedness To It
There’s No Lightheartedness To It
It’s the same problem that Man of Steel dealt with: unnecessary darkening. While the Fantastic Four have dealt with their fair share of serious events, they’ve always been light, good-humored characters. There’s no reason to go all The Dark Knight on it. Not every superhero movie has to feel the same, but the stories need to stay true to the essence of the characters. This feels overly dark and serious, and much more reminiscent to Josh Trank’s 2012 hit Chronicle than the actual Fantastic Four. To be fair, this isn’t much of a surprise, since Trank and others have been describing it as "grounded" for awhile, but these words should not be used to describe Marvel’s First Family. Say what you will about last decade’s Fantastic Four films, but at least they had a sense of humor (even if it was misplaced at times).

 2. Where Are Their Powers?
Where Are Their Powers?
A brief shot of The Thing’s back, several blink-and-you’ll-miss-it shots of Johnny Storm flaming on and a shot that shows Reed Richards presumably about to stretch. That’s the extent of the Fantastic Four’s powers in this trailer. The purpose of a teaser it to… well, tease the audience about what’s coming. But c’mon! They couldn’t have given us a few more demonstrations of the four using their abilities? A few added shots of Reed actually stretching, Sue Storm turning invisible, The Thing rampaging and Johnny Storm flying was all that would have been necessary, and it only would have added a few more seconds. Set-up for how they get their powers is fine, but fans mainly want to see these powers in action!

1. There’s Still No Doctor Doom
There’s Still No Doctor Doom
Even if we didn’t see much of their abilities, at least we got to see the protagonists. The same can’t be said for the antagonist, Victor Domashev, a.k.a. Doom (evidently he hasn’t earned his evil Ph.D yet). While we know what the character’s background and personality will be, there still hasn’t been photos of him other than those leaked images of the Doom costume on the green-screen set. It’s unfair to judge a character’s look until it’s been touched up in post-production, which is why this trailer would have been the perfect opportunity to feature the villain’s unusual appearance. There’s a brief shot at 1:21 of an unknown man attacking some soldiers, but there’s no way to know if it’s Doom. We’ll just have to wait a little longer to get our first look of Toby Kebbell as the Fantastic Four’s arch-nemesis.




Apple posts the biggest quarterly profit in history.

Apple posts the biggest quarterly profit in history.

Apple's China sales are up 70% - and about to grow further, John Sudworth reports

US technology giant Apple has reported the biggest quarterly profit ever made by a public company.
Apple reported a net profit of $18bn (£11.8bn) in its fiscal first quarter, which tops the $15.9bn made by ExxonMobil in the second quarter of 2012, according to Standard and Poor's.
Record sales of iPhones were behind the surge in profits.

Apple sold 74.5 million iPhones in the three months to 27 December - well ahead of most analysts' expectations.

Start Quote

I mean, a lot of us were expecting good iPhone sales during the holidays, but I don't think anybody really thought Apple was going to blow past 70 million units sold”
In a conference call with financial analysts Apple's chief executive Tim Cook said that demand for phones was "staggering".

However, sales of the iPad continued to disappoint, falling by 18% in 2014 from a year earlier.
The demand for Apple's larger iPhone 6 Plus model appeared to help boost profits and increase the iPhone's gross profit margin - or how much Apple makes per phone - by 2% to 39.9%.

However, Apple did not give a breakdown of sales for the iPhone 6 and other models.
Apple shares rose more than 5% in trading after the US markets had closed.

Buster Hein, who edits the "Cult of Mac" website, told the BBC that iPhone sales had surpassed expectations.

"Oh my gosh, it's unbelievable," he said. "I mean, a lot of us were expecting good iPhone sales during the holidays, but I don't think anybody really thought Apple was going to blow past 70 million units sold," he said.

"Apple became the number one smartphone company in China in the last quarter, which was just huge for them," he added.

line
Preparations for the opening of an Apple store in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province
Analysis: Richard Taylor, BBC North America Technology Correspondent
 
Apple's impressive results represent a significant shift towards the massive untapped potential of China.
With a strong line-up of devices entering the final quarter, it was able to reap the fruits of its deal with the world's biggest mobile network, China Mobile.

However, the success of its latest big-screen iPhones may have contributed to further cannibalising sales of the iPad.

The once unstoppable tablet is being further squeezed both by a resurgence in laptop sales, as well as by competition - both in an increasingly saturated US market and in emerging markets by lower-priced, rival machines.

All eyes now are on the Apple Watch - but with a relatively high base price it is not clear whether it will be able to woo more than the Apple faithful.

line
Apple Watch, Cuppertino The Apple Watch is due for release in April
 
BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones said the iPhone had "transformed the mobile phone industry".

"Others have a bigger share of the market - Samsung, for instance, actually sells more phones than Apple - but Apple makes just an extraordinary amount of money from this one phone.

"A lot of this, at the moment, is about China, where this brand has got extraordinary cache. They [Apple] sold more phones in China in the last quarter than they have in the United States."

He added that one possible shadow on Apple's future was the question of whether the firm could repeat the success of the iPhone.

"The next one [product] that's supposed to be coming along is the Apple Watch in April," he said. "I've got some doubts as to whether that will be the mass market success, beyond the geek population, that the iPhone has been."
  
Apple's revenue grew to $74.6bn in 2014 - a 30% increase from a year earlier.

However, on a conference call to discuss earnings, Mr Cook complained of "fierce foreign exchange volatility", which added Apple to a growing list of US firms who have been hurt by the strong dollar abroad.
Apple said that currency fluctuations shaved 4% from its first-quarter revenue.

Sales in greater China hit $16bn in 2014 - a 70% increase from a year earlier, and almost equalling the $17bn in sales the company recorded in Europe last year.

A report by research firm Canalys released on Tuesday said that Apple had overtaken competitors to become China's number one seller of smartphones by units shipped in the fourth quarter of 2014.
Apple also said that its newest product, the Apple Watch, was still on schedule and would begin shipping in April.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Apple supplier Foxconn to shrink workforce as sales growth stalls

Apple supplier Foxconn to shrink workforce as sales growth stalls




Employees work inside a Foxconn factory in the township of Longhua in the southern Guangdong province in this May 26, 2010 file photo.  REUTERS/Bobby Yip
Employees work inside a Foxconn factory in the township of Longhua in the southern Guangdong province


(Reuters) - Taiwan's Foxconn Technology Group, the world's largest contract electronics manufacturer, will cut its massive workforce, the company told Reuters, as the Apple Inc (AAPL.O) supplier faces declining revenue growth and rising wages inChina.
Under its flagship unit Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd, the group currently employs about 1.3 million people during peak production times, making it one of the largest private employers in the world.
Special assistant to the chairman and group spokesman Louis Woo did not specify a timeframe or target for the reduction, but noted that labor costs had more than doubled since 2010, when the company faced intense media scrutiny following a spate of worker suicides.
"We've basically stabilized (our workforce) in the last three years," Woo said. When asked if the company plans to reduce overall headcount, he responded "yes".
Revenue growth at the conglomerate tumbled to 1.3 percent in 2013 and only partially recovered to 6.5 percent last year after a long string of double-digit increases from 2003 to 2012.
That decade saw the firm ride an explosion of popularity in PCs, smartphones and tablets, largely driven by its main client Apple, but now it is feeling the effects of falling growth and prices in the gadget markets it supplies, a trend that is expected to continue.
Growth in smartphone sales will halve this year from 26 percent in 2014, according to researcher IDC, while PC sales will contract by 3 percent.
Similarly, the average smartphone will sell for 19 percent less in 2018 than last year's $297.
"Even if technology is improving, the price will still come down," Woo said. "We've come to accept that, our customers have come to accept that."
Automation will be key to keeping labor costs under control in the long-term, Woo said, as the company pushes to have robotic arms complete mundane tasks currently done by workers.

But Woo noted that company chairman Terry Gou's previously stated goal of 1 million robots was "a generic concept" rather than a firm target.

How to choose better gadgets



How to choose better gadgets

How to choose better gadgets

This is the only way we can make you stick to the pledge that you will no longer buy gadgets in blissful ignorance!
This is the only way we can make you stick to the pledge that you will no longer buy gadgets in blissful ignorance!

Have you ever thought why one power bank is costlier than another? Why hard disks are passe (almost)? Why you can still trust a cheating partner, but not a pirated anti-virus? How the dude who installed the `free wi-fi router' at your place made a fool out of you? How anti-radiation chips undo the harm done by the heap of devices around you? If you don't know the answers to the above, leave everything else that you are doing right now and read this buyer's guide.

Power Bank

Mobile makers have over committed and under-delivered on battery back-up, which is why power banks have become the new fad.Genius buys it like: I don't subscribe to the `I'll buy anything that's cheap and Chinese' school of thought because I want more than just the basics. My power bank should charge multiple devices simultaneously, not waste energy while charging the plugged-in device, and quickly charge itself and the devices. Then, it should automatically turn itself off when idle, should be certified for safety by safety certifications like EEE, 6 Way Circuit Protection or any other popular safety standard agency.



Techxpert: Sudip De, vice-president, Adata, says, "Unlike the power bank, your mobile device is not cheap, so, if you buy a faulty product, it will damage your device."

Anti-Virus Software

If you ever meet someone who has purchased an anti-virus and not downloaded a pirated version of it, most likely, you are hallucinating because such people don't exist, and this, when anti-virus is one of the most crucial computer tools.Genius buys it like: Does my system have the RAM and processor required to run the anti-virus? Is the software itself compatible with my system? Will I be able to erase the data if the system gets stolen and click pictures of the thief when he uses my system? Does it have bootable rescue?

Will the anti-virus be able to defend itself when a virus tries to disable it? If it does all of this, I will buy it.Techxpert: Pankaj Jain, director, Eset India, says, "Sadly, security comes last for an anti-virus purchaser; price is first. The biggest loss of a pirated anti-virus user is that they don't get the support from the developer, so if one fine day, the system crashes, the user will have no one to go to for help."

An anti-virus should be anti-virus, anti-malware, antiTrojan, antirootkit, antiphishing, give email and instant messaging protection, be certified by independent testing agencies and labs, be fast, scan cloud and have 24x7 support mechanism.

Mobile-scan app

With growing internet activity on smartphones, a mobile scan app will soon be a must.Genius buys it like: My scan app should not consume too much battery, it should provide add-on features like tracking over and above basic scanning, blocking inappropriate websites and prohibiting downloads from non-Apple and non-Android app-stores, Most importantly, it should let me completely wipe out the data on the phone in case of theft.Techxpert: Govind Rammurthy, MD & CEO, eScan, says, "The app should warn any transmissions of contact lists and should have the ability to block the same, detect transactions that use mobile-wallets andor other forms of mobile-money and store records, transaction details on the cloud."

Routers

Don't just blame your mobile operator for the snailpaced internet; your `free' router might be at fault.Genius buys it like: I will buy a router that is capable of handling high-speed, that lets me create small networks with limited use for guests, has parental control, is low in radiation and lets me manage media and connects multiple devices.Techxpert: Subhodeep Bhattacharya, regional director, India & SAARC, Netgear, says, "A router is the hub of the digital ecosys tem, and if it's built around an ignorantly purchased router, all the thrill that you expect from your high-end gadgets will come to a naught."

SSDs

These compact, superfast, durable and energy-efficient data storage solutions will change the way you store data.Genius buys it like: I'll buy an SSD as it's smaller, sturdier and faster than hard disks. It should preferably fit in the camera too, and have shockproof capabilities for accidental drops.Techxpert: M A Mannan, country manager - India, Corsair Memory, says, "No SSD is a poor performer but one with a 40,000 IOPS or more is better."

Radiation protection chip

With wireless gadgets starting to rule our lives, an anti-radiation chip, which protects you from electromagnetic radiation emitted by phones and other personal electronic devices, is a must-have.Genius buys it like: The chip has to be tested and approved for its capabilities at warding off the side-effects of benefits, by a medical institution in India.Techxpert: Pranav Poddar, MD, Synergy Environics, says, "A phone should not be used for more than six minutes in an hour and be kept at least 15-25 mm away from the body at all times. Since this is not possible, you need something, like an anti-radiation chip, that will let you use devices for extended time."

Monday, January 26, 2015

How affordable smartphones are leading in innovation

How affordable smartphones are leading in innovation


The smartphone market has evolved to such a point in recent times that the affordable smartphone is now what's causing the maximum excitement. While the iPhone will continue to receive the fanfare it enjoys, the focus and innovation now has moved towards cheaper hardware.
Why?

Well, in developed markets like the US, expensive devices are subsidised, which means many people can afford even an iPhone 6, which starts at $199 on a contract. This is roughly the same amount one would pay for a low- to mid-range smartphone like a Moto G in India.

Therefore, when players like Xiaomi and OnePlus enter the market and offer products boasting the same type of hardware specifications as a Samsung Galaxy S5 for less than half the price, the excitement becomes palpable. Hence, the clamour for OnePlus One invites, the outcry over the flash sales conducted by Xiaomi and Yu on Flipkart and Amazon. This may not be technological innovation in the truest sense, but this is certainly the case of an innovative business model.

Even the component makers are chipping in to herald the new era of affordable computing devices. Let's take Qualcomm as an example. It's Snapdragon 615 and 410 processors are as powerful as its flagship chipsets from two years ago and now they offer additional features like more cores, 64-bit and 4G support.When seen holistically, you probably get better Android hardware for less than Rs 10,000 than what you got for a phone like the Galaxy S4 two years ago for Rs 42,000. The point of dumping so much cash when a phone is launched is not only some intangible flaunt value, but also a level of future readiness.

yu-yureka-690_012615032438.jpg
The Micromax Yu Yureka.

It can be argued that a phone like the Yu Yureka offers a better software and hardware experience than the two year old Galaxy S4. The Yu Yureka costs Rs 8,999 and you could dump that amount each year on a new phone, and get a faster phone and still save around Rs 10,000 if you think about buying the latest Android flagship phone.

Of course, phone makers like Samsung and LG understand that for their flagship phones they need to offer more. Hence, they come up with newer technologies like self-healing backs and curved displays. Unfortunately, the use cases of these new technologies are not obvious yet.

And that's why for the time being, it is the powerful low cost smartphone that will cause more impact than say a big ticket smartphone launch. The blunt truth is that the smartphone market is commoditised like the Windows PC market.

The buzz is more in the software than expensive hardware. However, every now and then, there is a really powerful affordable phone, and it will always cause a stir.


Why should Hamid Ansari prove his patriotism?

Why should Hamid Ansari prove his patriotism?


It seems that no matter how many times a Muslim swears his allegiance to the Indian nation, no matter how successful he becomes in the country, there will always be doubts over his patriotism. Even if you are the vice-president of India, if you are a Muslim, you still have to prove your love for the country.
This morning when most Indians were watching the Republic Day parade with pride, some self-proclaimed defenders of the nation decided to use their off-day criticising vice president Hamid Ansari. Pictures were posted on Twitter and Facebook showing that Ansari did not salute the national flag during the national anthem. "Jihadi sympathiser", "anti-India", "traitor", these were some of the names that the vice president of India was hurled at on the country's 66th Republic Day. Many tweeted demanding that Ansari be impeached, the more moderate ones wanted him to resign, the more outraged ones advised him to join the ISIS.

ansari-embed_012615054153.gif
The picture that is being circulated on social media accusing the vice president of "disrespecting" the national flag.

Now, the more immediate question here is what is the protocol? According to Section VI of the Flag Code of India, which deals with the protocols for saluting the flag, "During the ceremony of hoisting or lowering the flag, or when the flag is passing in a parade or in a review, all persons present should face the Flag and stand at attention. Those present in uniform should render the appropriate salute". Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Pranab Mukherjee, vice president Ansari, US President Barack Obama, defence minister Manohar Parrikar were not in uniform and were therefore not required to salute the flag. President Mukherjee, Modi and Parrikar actually made a mistake by saluting the flag, Ansari did the right thing.
But who cares about protocol when you are performing the great duty of defending the nation? If Ansari didn't salute the flag, it has to be because he is following some subversive anti-national injunction in the Sharia. Of course home minister Rajnath Singh and external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj also didn't salute the flag, but then being non-Muslims, their patriotism is beyond question.

Not just Ansari, other prominent Muslims have been subjected to similar attacks. So when Aamir Khan as PK, criticised Hindu godmen, questions were raised whether the film had Pakistani funding. When Paresh Rawal did the same in OMG! Oh My God, he was upholding the cause of rationality and scientific temper. Sania Mirza might have won 14 medals and 24 WTA titles for India, but she is called a Pakistani by leaders from a mainstream political party like the BJP.

It isn't just the lunatic right wing that subscribes to such views. The belief Muslims just aren't good Indians exists in the subconscious of many, even well-meaning people. Bollywood filmmakers are a good example. For instance, take the recently released Baby, starring Akshay Kumar. In the film, a terrorist tells the hero that in the religion column of government forms, he writes "MUSLIM" in bold and capital letters. Kumar responds by saying that he writes "INDIAN", in bold and capital letters. So just as the pack of internet Hindus want the vice president of India to deviate from protocol to prove his patriotism, the film is giving Indian Muslims a crash course in patriotism which involves providing wrong information in government forms. It seems we are going back to the days when people were asked whether they are Muslims first, or Indians first. 

If Indian Muslims have to become chest-thumping caricatures in order to be seen as Indian enough, is there something wrong with these 17 crore people or does the flaw lie in the understanding of patriotism that is widely gaining currency?


Flagship fight: which Android phone wins in 2014?


Flagship fight: which Android phone wins in 2014?

flagship-fight-android-2014-08-01
My my my, what an interesting year this has been for phones.
This year, Apple really does have its work cut out for it when it comes to making a product that can beat what’s out this year. But what if you want something from the slate of Android phones out now: what’s the best Android for your money?
We’ve reviewed them all, and then some, spending time with them in our lives and used them as a real phone, so let’s see just which is better from our point of view, working this out not just in different areas, but really getting down to the nitty gritty for those of you who just aren’t sure yet.

Design and build

We’ll start with the most obvious one for all these handsets: the look, and then the feel, and they all have something different to offer here.



Samsung, for instance, has taken an approach closer to what it offers in its tablets, with a plastic body, shiny faux metal trim, and a dimpled back to give the feeling that you’re holding a fabric or leather-bound handset that won’t slip out of the hands.
It’s comfortable, that’s for sure, but well built it isn’t, feeling more like plastic and less like a strengthened material like metal or aluminium.



LG has taken a similar approach, adopting plastic in the design but painting it to look metal. That’s a slightly better approach, and the G3 feels a touch stronger than the S5 and just as comfortable, but it’s still plastic.
HTC and Sony are thinking along the same lines, however, making their phones out of premium materials.
In the case of HTC’s One M8, it’s mostly made out of aluminium, and we’re not kidding on that, with a brushed aluminium making up around 90 percent of the handset’s design, with glass the rest thanks to the screen. It’s certainly schmick, and it feels fantastic and solid in the hands, too.



Sony’s Xperia Z2 has a similar approach, taking aluminium for the sides and encasing the rest of the handset in glass, making it feel very premium, similar to what Apple did with the iPhone 4 and LG with its Optimus G, the first in the G series handset.

Our only quibble with the Xperia Z2 design is that it’s so angular that it can ruin pants and jeans, as we found out when we carried it around for an extended amount of time.


Ruggedisation

Making a phone water and dust proof is now a thing, because you’re going to take it out of the office, so why not make it as durable as humanly possible?
In this year’s four flagship fighters, only two are slightly ruggedised, with water and dust resistance applied to the Sony Xperia Z2 and Samsung’s Galaxy S5. You can probably get the HTC One and LG G3 a little bit wet, but don’t expect them to perform like what Sony and Samsung have provided.
Both have protection against water and dust, but to different limits, and keep in mind, if you want these to keep resisting these elements and not succumb to a watery grave or die a dusty death, you need to leave their little plug ports closed when the particles or droplets hit.



For those unaware of IP ratings, it stands for “Ingress Protection” and is an international rating to determine levels of resistance to elements that don’t normally agree with electrical components. We’ve seen it in devices before, but up until 2013, they were generally very bulky, so its introduction in slim-line phones is a pretty serious development.
In IP ratings, the first number relates to dust or “solid particle” protection, while the second is about liquids.
Samsung’s S5 relies on an IP67 rating, and when you break that down, that means it is protected against all dust (6) making it dust tight, while the 7 means the Galaxy S5 can survive contact with water for an immersion of up to a metre.



Sony’s Z2 has an IP58 rating, which cuts back on the dust protection a bit, bringing it to mostly dust protected though some might get in, while the 8 in the IP rating means the Xperia Z2 can go beyond one metre in depth, though usually only to a maximum of three metres.
The time you spend with that phone under water will probably be small-ish, with around 15 to 30 minutes the most you’ll want to use it for at one time, but it’s still a pretty decent amount of time with a phone underwater, so that’s something.






Screen

The people have spoken, and big screens are in, with customers — and manufacturers — preferring big screens to surf the web, take photos, and generally have at their disposal, making smartphones and tablets closer than ever.
We’ve met lots of people who are ditching tablets for big screens, and in the flagships this year, there’s a minimum of 5 inches of screen real estate to work with, finding 5 inches on the HTC One, 5.1 on the Samsung S5, 5.2 on Sony’s Xperia Z2, and 5.5 on the LG G3.
All of these have at least Full HD resolution (1920×1080), with the LG G3 moving beyond that — the only phone in Australia to do so at present — featuring 2560×1440 or Quad HD (QHD), with all four supporting a pixel clarity greater — yes, greater — than Apple’s Retina-grade iPhone 5S, with each packing in at least 100 pixels more per inch.
There’s an argument, mind you, that says all of this is moot past 300 pixels per inch, with our eyes being the bottleneck, but you’ll have to let your eyes be the judge there.
Sufficed to say, all four of these phones have excellent screens, but we’d have to give the award on this one to LG’s G3 because nothing comes close to the quality offered from this one.

Performance

This is one area that should be identical, or close to it, between all the handsets, because in essence they all run on the same basic setup in this country.
As such, you can expect a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 quad-core processor with varying speeds (all over 2GHz, and generally between 2.3 and 2.6), the Adreno 330 graphics chip, at least 2GB RAM, and Google’s Android 4.4 also known as “KitKat.”
That’s the basic spec all the manufacturers have gone with this year, and you’ll also find a microSD slot for all of the flagships in this article, with the Samsung Galaxy S5, HTC One M8, LG G3, and Sony Xperia Z2 all support upgradeable storage on top of the 16 and 32GBs the various variants will come with.
As such, they all boast excellent performance with only a spot of lag on some of them, but not enough to cry over, so chances are that you’ll be very happy.


Connectivity

Just like how all the phones have similar specs and equally similar performance, they all pretty much have the same connection options, with the exception of one or two things.
For instance, all of these phones support 4G LTE in Category 4, meaning if you have a telco that supports Category 4 connectivity, you could see speeds of up to 150Mbps coming down and 50Mbps up. If you just have a Category 3 connection — and that’s Telstra in Sydney at the time our reviews and this article was written — you’ll only see speeds of up to 100Mbps down.
Neither are anything to sneeze at, and in our tests, all four performed excellently, with speeds ranging between 20 and 90Mbps for each of the handsets.


Samsung's performance in 4G speeds is just like the others: excellent.
All support 3G as well, with phone calls still possible, too, so areas without the lovely speed boost that is 4G won’t be left with nothing.
Wireless networks is, of course, included across all of the models, with 802.11ac here, as well as backwards compatibility for the older 809.11b/g/n networks many still use in Australia.
Bluetooth 4.0 is also provided with support for the Low Energy/Smart options, as is Near-Field Communication, GPS, A-GPS, and there’s infrared in every phone except for the Z2.


The top of the HTC One houses an infrared port.
Why would you want infrared?
If you’re in the mood for some TV, feel like changing the volume on your amp or want to fiddle with the temperature on your air conditioner, an IR transmitter lets you use your phone as a remote, which is something the Samsung Galaxy S5, HTC One M8, and LG G3 all offer, but Sony’s phone does not.
MicroUSB is offered across all, as well, though Samsung’s Galaxy S5 does come with microUSB 3, which should be faster.



Battery life and charging

Battery life is one of those hard areas where it can be totally different for every person.
In our tests, the HTC One and Sony Xperia Z2 seem to lead the competition, making it to almost two days of life, while the LG G3 barely grabs a day, and the Samsung Galaxy S5 often loses out to just under a day.
To Samsung’s credit, however, it does come with an ultra low power saving mode that makes it possible to get a full 24 hours of life in those times when you have very little life to work with.



When it goes to this mode, some neat things happen, such as the disabling of connections, push and synchronisation, and even the screen going black and white, which we’ve proven doesn’t do as much as Samsung indicates, except to dissuade you from using your handset.
Charging all of the phones from these brands is handled through a microUSB port, with HTC and LG leaving theirs exposed, while Sony and Samsung have port covers thanks to the ingress protection for dust and water resistance.
LG and Sony, though, have other charging options.



For instance, the Sony Xperia Z2 has a proprietary magnetic port on the side to support its own dock format for charging, making it more convenient for bedside charging than relying on a simple microUSB port.
LG goes even further and includes the wireless Qi charging we saw on the Google Nexus 5 (made by LG) and some of Nokia’s handsets, making it possible to charge your phone just be leaving it on an induction pad.
Without a doubt, this is our favourite charging option, and if your phone supports this, you get high marks from us. All charging should be as effortless as this.

Camera

If you had the choice of carrying just your smartphone and its camera or a smartphone and a dedicated camera, most people will probably choose the former, and it’s a fact camera makers are being forced to face.
Compact cameras are going the way of the dodo — poor dodo — and smartphone cameras are replacing them, because unless you’ve been living in a cave and don’t have access to any smartphone, all of the devices out there that cost over $500 have decent cameras that can rival your regular compact, provided you don’t mind having any zoom.
The flagship models we’re looking at certainly come with decent cameras, and they’re all very capable and yet very decent.
We won’t go into the nitty gritty of each — we have reviews for that, so check the last page of this guide — but there are some things to focus on.



HTC’s is likely the first that will grab attention, technically including two cameras with different lenses for some very impressive effects. Change the focus distance after the fact, work with combined colour filters across different planes, and take high quality front-facing pictures with a 5 megapixel camera.
These are just some of the things HTC is offering in the new One, and if it wasn’t for the fact that the Ultrapixel camera on the back was only technically 4 megapixels, we’d be highly impressed.

Separating foreground from background means effects can occur on a different layer.

But it’s only a 4 megapixel camera, and that’s not a great thing to have around.
Oh sure, in low light, it’s quite nice, and the technology means you can do some really creative things, but just be weary images can’t be resized all that much on the One M8.
The same cannot be said for the others, as the LG G3 features a 13 megapixel shooter, the Samsung Galaxy S5 goes for a 16 megapixel camera, and Sony’s packs in a 20 megapixel module that can either shoot in the full resolution or pack the image with pixels back down to 8 megapixels.

An image from the Galaxy S5's camera

All three of them are great cameras, and all three offer Ultra HD capturing, perfect for those 4K TVs and monitors starting to come out, which is another feature the HTC misses out on, with only Full HD offered there.
They all have different features on top of the great cameras, mind you, and we’re particularly happy with:
LG’s laser-based autofocus, which provides speedy contrast-detection focus times relying on a small laser
Samsung’s playful image modes, many of which do similar things to the camera in the HTC One M8, and
Sony’s software for the Z2, and how it lets you flex creative muscle thanks to the sheer number of artistic effects on offer (we had way too much fun with the mosaic one, which made photos look like 8-bit video games).
Basically, all the cameras are excellent, but we’d have to say that Sony and LG felt like the best for us throughout our testing.

Shot from the Sony Xperia Z2 smartphone

One awesome extra feature

Outside of the performance, connectivity, battery, and camera, each phone has their star features that make them excellent, and while our reviews list them in greater detail, we’re also going to cover our favourite extra feature of each here, because they’re worth knowing about even in short (we’re doing this in alphabetical order, not in preference, so don’t go confusing that).

HTC One M8
Aside for the build and camera, the feature you need to know about is the BoomSound speakers, which are two very loud front-facing speakers.
These were present in last year’s One, and this year they’re louder and better, making them ideal for music, movies and the spot of YouTube you love when you’re doing nothing.
We wish all phone speakers were this good.



LG G3
LG seems to pack more extra pizzazz in its phone than anyone else, and in this handset, our favourite is support for high-res audio.
If you’re sick of streaming music services and prefer high-end sound, LG’s G3 is the only smartphone of this bunch to support 192kHz 24-bit FLAC, playing back the high-end format in severaly impressive quality if you have some equally impressive headphones nearby.
With credit to LG, this existed on the LG G2, but that phone had fixed memory, making this mostly useless, especially since an hour of audio can be over a gigabyte in size. Now with expandable memory, this is a serious reason to use this phone, and really makes you wonder why you’d bother with Sony’s dedicated portable high-res audio player.

Support for high res audio (HRA)? Yes please!

Samsung Galaxy S5
We’re going to cheat a little with Samsung and include two features here, because one is useful and the other is useless, but both are missing in action on the other handsets and are both based on the human body. Confused yet?
The useful one is the fingerprint reader, which is built into the home button and allows you to tie your fingerprint to unlocking your phone and paying for things with PayPal. That last one is especially important, and we’re keen to see it used in more apps later on down the track, as it will be harder to break than your regular PIN code.
Over in the useless category is the heart rate checker, which is a neat gimmick to tell you how elevated your heart is, but we’ll probably never use it, and honestly, it doesn’t seem overly accurate, anyway.


Heart rate monitor? The S5 has it. Whether we'll use it or not, well, that has yet to be decided.
Sony Xperia Z2
Sony seems to pack in less “wow” features than anyone else, but the one we really like is the inclusion of a camera button.
It seems so minor, but that camera button on the side lets you go from standby to the camera mode in no time at all, making it more useful as a quick shooter than any of the smartphone cameras it competes against. Pair this with the abundance of camera modes and you have a fantastic little extra.


Value

With all of this technology inside these devices, you have to wonder how much they cost, and being flagship products, the natural assumption is that they’re not cheap.
Oh sure, they’re all available on plans, and when you pay for something over the course of a year or two, that helps to spread that value, but if you decide to do it in one lump — which is how we judge value — which one is worth it most of all?
From our tests, LG’s G3 may turn out the best value altogether, packing in more technology across the board and strong performance for a recommended retail price of $799, just forty bucks more than what Sony asks for, with the Xperia Z2 fetching $759 for what it includes, while HTC makes you pay almost $900 for the privilege, fetching an RRP of $899.
Samsung does manage to push over that $900 price, and if you want to grab one of these outright, expect to pay $929. Ouch.

Cases

If you can’t accessorize your phone, what’s the point?

A highly resistant screen protector from Neon on the left and two Belkin cases on the right, all three for Samsung's Galaxy S5 handset.
We’re not huge fans of cases, but lots of people are, as they protect your purchase from the traumas of your pocket, handbag, backpack, and anything else, especially if the worst happens — heaven forbid — and they take a tumble.
In this department, Samsung seems to have the most push, with companies such as Belkin, Incipio, Otterbox, and Samsung providing a few options out there, and other brands no doubt chiming in that we’ve missed (apologies there).
The other manufacturers don’t quite have as much to work with, as LG’s G3 can be cased up thanks to LG’s own windowed cases, HTC’s One M8 has a really neat pixelating case you can use the phone through, while the Sony cases that we’ve seen are your basic wraparound or edge protectors.

HTC's One M8 case (left) and LG's G3 circle window case (right)

Conclusion

There’s no doubt that all of the products this year have impressive bones, and while their marketing budgets are also likely to help sway you, it would be hard to end up on a poor product, it really would.
Each one is excellent, it truly is, and if you’re looking for a new phone, you’ll be happy this year with either.
For our money, though, we’d choose Sony’s Xperia Z2 first, and here’s why: while LG’s G3 beats it in screen quality and overall features, the Z2 pack in a better build, a just as excellent camera with better software, and IP67 ruggedisation that lets us wash it off if it ever gets dirty.
In this writer’s opinion, those two are the best of the best this year, but regardless of what you choose, you’ll likely be satisfied.
The best test, mind you, once you’ve read our reviews and worked out which has the feature set you want is and has always been to go in store and put the phone in your hand. We can always tell you the good and the bad, but how it feels in your hands, your pockets, and what it feels like when you hold it up to your head will ultimately decide it, so read our reviews and then take those opinions into a store, because we can’t tell you how to feel when it comes to that whole physical side of things.
Now, in the order of what we think…

Sony Xperia Z2



Price: $759 outright; Available on plans from Telstra, Optus, and Vodafone;
It might seem strange that we’re awarding the Z2 our top marks, but it comes from the mixture of everything, with a solid body, some of that awesome dust and water resistance, a fantastic camera, and a speedy operating system thanks to 3GB RAM being more than what is generally included (2GB is Android’s sweet spot).
Our only major complaints with Sony’s Z2 extend from it destroying a pair of pants and from the Bluetooth feeling weaker in our tests than the other handsets, but that’s minor.

LG G3



Price: $799 outright; Available on plans from Telstra, Optus, and Vodafone;
You know what they say about “three times being the charm,” because that certainly applies here: LG’s third G series phone to hit Australia is a winner, and even though it could still do with a better material for the chassis, it has been designed well, includes a great camera, upgradeable storage, a speedy version of Android, and the best screen available in Australia today.
In fairness, this one is so new that we haven’t spent as much time with it, so in time, it could prove just as much of a favourite, but right now, our one wish for LG would have been a better chassis material, because that alone would have pushed this right to the top for us.

HTC One 2014 (M8)




Price: $899 outright; Available on plans from Telstra, Optus, and Vodafone;
Without a doubt, HTC’s One is the best built of the lot, with an aluminium block taking up most of the casing and a build that is so much better than the rest of the competition. HTC’s screen is also very nice, and we’re delighted to see microSD upgradeable storage, something the old One didn’t address.
While the Ultrapixel camera is very creative, we’re not in agreement with HTC in that 4 megapixels is enough, especially since Instagram can poke holes in that number, but otherwise, it’s a fantastic phone, especially with those two front-facing speakers.

Samsung Galaxy S5





Price: $929 outright; Available on plans from Telstra, Optus, and Vodafone;
While the S5 doesn’t quite have the oomph of last year’s model, it’s still an excellent product, packing in water and dust resistance, a decent camera with UHD video support, and a heart-rate monitor for those who find that sort of thing useful.
Since our review, Samsung has even unlocked that shortcut dock — how nice of them to restore the functionality everyone else has — so it’s a wee bit better than in our review. We wish the battery life was better and that it wasn’t made of such a cheap feeling material, but we’ll give credit where it’s due: it’s a comfy phone to hold.



Now it’s your turn, so tell us in the comments below: which phone do you rate the best and why?